ADVERTISEMENT
vendredi, avril 16, 2021
No Result
View All Result
Bruxelles.News
0 °c
Brussels
8 ° Sat
9 ° Sun
10 ° Mon
10 ° Tue
  • EU AFFAIRES
  • MONDE
    • Economie
  • BRUXELLES
  • BELGIQUE
    • Regions
  • SPORT
  • POLITIQUE
  • MAGAZINE
  • DES AVIS
  • EU AFFAIRES
  • MONDE
    • Economie
  • BRUXELLES
  • BELGIQUE
    • Regions
  • SPORT
  • POLITIQUE
  • MAGAZINE
  • DES AVIS
No Result
View All Result
Bruxelles.News
No Result
View All Result
Home DES AVIS

Opinion | L’etat C’est Moi: Leopold II and Belgium’s imperial memorials

by Bnews
juin 17, 2020
in DES AVIS
284.4k 2.9k
0
31.4k
SHARES
522.3k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


© Belga

As the Black Lives Matter protests go global and gather strength around the world, monuments to imperialism and slavery are being torn down in its wake as Europe joins the US in grappling with its own race issues.

Statues of prominent, often controversial, historical figures have been defaced and torn down. In Belgium, statues of Leopold II, King of the Belgians, have been defaced and burnt, and two petitions calling for the removal of statues of the former king begins to gather pace; at the time of writing, they have over 78,000 signatures.

Leopold’s propaganda

This is the latest chapter in an ever-growing debate over Belgium’s bloody colonial history and its memorialisation as represented by the many statues and hundreds of streets named after Leopold. The architect of Belgian colonialism, Leopold’s legacy lives on through the memorials to his reign in the Congo.

Leopold relinquished his hold on the Congo Free State (CFS), a region that had been his personal fiefdom for nearly thirty years, to the Belgian government in 1908.

During his reign, a system Leopold implemented in order to maximise profits from the ivory and rubber trade resulted in the mutilation, rape, and murder of Congolese natives. His rule in the Congo Free State left a bitter legacy of violence and cruelty amongst the Congolese.

Yet in Belgium, the opposite has been true for decades. Statues were erected, and streets and tunnels named after the king.

A central reason for this celebration of Leopold’s colonial endeavour was the success of his propaganda efforts in the face of criticism of his rule emanating primarily from British and American activists who sought reform in the Congo and, specifically, annexation of the region to the Belgian government.

Leopold successfully used propaganda to deflect criticism of his government’s system and its brutality towards the Congolese people up until annexation in 1908.

The first criticisms of the Congo government emerged in 1890 from an African-American named George Washington Williams, whose Open Letter was the first to accuse Leopold of ‘crimes against humanity’.

Leopold’s press bureau began its ad hominem attacks on Williams, attempting to destroy his character and standing in order to undermine his criticisms. This was a tactic Leopold successfully deployed throughout the 1890s and into the 1900s, diffusing reform efforts and delaying international intervention on the Congo issue.

This was done by using ad hominem attacks on key activists, arousing suspicions of donors and their motivations, and drawing attention to the colonial policies of other imperial powers whose mistreatment of its ‘subjects’, according to Leopold and his supporters, was not too dissimilar to that of his treatment of the Congolese.

Leopold was to exercise control over the narrative until his death in 1909 and beyond. Shortly before the Belgian government annexed the Congo Free State, all of the State archives held in Brussels and in the Congo were placed into furnaces and incinerated, forever condemning the voices of those implicated and affected by the Congo Free State government to silence.

A debate reopened

From 1909 onwards, the story of exploitation and reform in the Congo Free State almost vanished in Belgian government circles and the popular consciousness. Instead, Belgium consciously embarked on a rewriting of its history in the Congo Free State.

It denied access to its archives to historians and scholars in fear that they would damage the reputation of Belgium and it was the colonisers who wrote the school textbooks in Africa, maintaining and reinforcing Leopold’s initial argument of the ‘civilising mission’.

The same textbooks also maintained that Leopold’s rule was humanitarian as it oversaw the abolition of the Arab slave trade in the region, again neglecting to highlight the brutal system of forced labour that contributed to the deaths of around 10 million Congolese during Leopold’s reign in the Congo Free State.

The spotlight was put back onto Belgium’s colonial exploits in the Congo Free State with the publication in 1998 of Hochschild’s book King Leopold’s Ghost.

In 2004, a BBC Four documentary White King, Red Rubber, Black Death was aired, examining the history of Belgian colonial rule in the Congo, using mock court scenes where individuals who witnessed the brutal oppression in the Congo give their testaments, effectively putting Leopold on trial for his complicity in the atrocities committed.

The following year, the Royal Museum of Central Africa in Belgium (recently renamed AfricaMuseum), introduced the first exhibit to deal seriously with the Leopoldian and Belgian colonial periods of Congo history.

In 2018, the museum, which had been created to be used as a propaganda for Leopold, reopened with a new, more critical focus on Belgium’s colonial past; an approach that has not only divided the museum staff who curate the exhibits but one that has also drawn criticism from the ‘Old Colonials’ who feel it lacks balance in its account of Belgian colonialism and disproportionately focuses on violence and death.

Yet these efforts to redress the balance mark a new chapter in Belgium’s understanding of its colonial history.

However, there has been some pushback on this revisionism. Key government figures declared Leopold a hero and visionary for his Congo Free State project, whilst other supporters have perpetuated Leopold’s ‘civilising myth’ by claiming that when Leopold arrived the region ‘wasn’t even in the Middle Ages’.

In 2012, a Belgian court ruled against a campaign to ban Herge’s Tintin in the Congo, stating that the book displayed a ‘kind paternalism’ and was not racist.

The conflict in opinion and tension that exists within Belgian society regarding its imperial past is a result of the success of Leopold’s propaganda campaign.

One significant consequence of this campaign was that it created a tradition of pro-empire propaganda. Leopold’s propaganda campaign played a significant role in maintaining the myth that his reign benefitted the Congolese people.

It was also crucial in the forging of an imperial mindset post-annexation and had dominated the narrative of Belgium’s colonial past since.

As the petition gains more signatures and the defacing of statues continues, the protesters and their supporters will face opposition from those whose understanding of Leopold’s role in the Congo and place in Belgium’s colonial history greatly differs from their own, and will ensure that the contest for shaping the narrative on Belgium’s colonial history will be as fierce as the Congo Free State propaganda war, and continue on well into the twenty-first century.

Dr Dean Clay

As the Black Lives Matter protests go global and gather strength around the world, monuments to imperialism and slavery are being torn down in its wake as Europe joins the US in grappling with its own race issues.

Statues of prominent, often controversial, historical figures have been defaced and torn down. In Belgium, statues of Leopold II, King of the Belgians, have been defaced and burnt, and two petitions calling for the removal of statues of the former king begins to gather pace; at the time of writing, they have over 78,000 signatures.

Leopold’s propaganda

This is the latest chapter in an ever-growing debate over Belgium’s bloody colonial history and its memorialisation as represented by the many statues and hundreds of streets named after Leopold. The architect of Belgian colonialism, Leopold’s legacy lives on through the memorials to his reign in the Congo.

Leopold relinquished his hold on the Congo Free State (CFS), a region that had been his personal fiefdom for nearly thirty years, to the Belgian government in 1908.

During his reign, a system Leopold implemented in order to maximise profits from the ivory and rubber trade resulted in the mutilation, rape, and murder of Congolese natives. His rule in the Congo Free State left a bitter legacy of violence and cruelty amongst the Congolese.

Yet in Belgium, the opposite has been true for decades. Statues were erected, and streets and tunnels named after the king.

A central reason for this celebration of Leopold’s colonial endeavour was the success of his propaganda efforts in the face of criticism of his rule emanating primarily from British and American activists who sought reform in the Congo and, specifically, annexation of the region to the Belgian government.

Leopold successfully used propaganda to deflect criticism of his government’s system and its brutality towards the Congolese people up until annexation in 1908.

The first criticisms of the Congo government emerged in 1890 from an African-American named George Washington Williams, whose Open Letter was the first to accuse Leopold of ‘crimes against humanity’.

Leopold’s press bureau began its ad hominem attacks on Williams, attempting to destroy his character and standing in order to undermine his criticisms. This was a tactic Leopold successfully deployed throughout the 1890s and into the 1900s, diffusing reform efforts and delaying international intervention on the Congo issue.

This was done by using ad hominem attacks on key activists, arousing suspicions of donors and their motivations, and drawing attention to the colonial policies of other imperial powers whose mistreatment of its ‘subjects’, according to Leopold and his supporters, was not too dissimilar to that of his treatment of the Congolese.

Leopold was to exercise control over the narrative until his death in 1909 and beyond. Shortly before the Belgian government annexed the Congo Free State, all of the State archives held in Brussels and in the Congo were placed into furnaces and incinerated, forever condemning the voices of those implicated and affected by the Congo Free State government to silence.

A debate reopened

From 1909 onwards, the story of exploitation and reform in the Congo Free State almost vanished in Belgian government circles and the popular consciousness. Instead, Belgium consciously embarked on a rewriting of its history in the Congo Free State.

It denied access to its archives to historians and scholars in fear that they would damage the reputation of Belgium and it was the colonisers who wrote the school textbooks in Africa, maintaining and reinforcing Leopold’s initial argument of the ‘civilising mission’.

The same textbooks also maintained that Leopold’s rule was humanitarian as it oversaw the abolition of the Arab slave trade in the region, again neglecting to highlight the brutal system of forced labour that contributed to the deaths of around 10 million Congolese during Leopold’s reign in the Congo Free State.

The spotlight was put back onto Belgium’s colonial exploits in the Congo Free State with the publication in 1998 of Hochschild’s book King Leopold’s Ghost.

In 2004, a BBC Four documentary White King, Red Rubber, Black Death was aired, examining the history of Belgian colonial rule in the Congo, using mock court scenes where individuals who witnessed the brutal oppression in the Congo give their testaments, effectively putting Leopold on trial for his complicity in the atrocities committed.

The following year, the Royal Museum of Central Africa in Belgium (recently renamed AfricaMuseum), introduced the first exhibit to deal seriously with the Leopoldian and Belgian colonial periods of Congo history.

In 2018, the museum, which had been created to be used as a propaganda for Leopold, reopened with a new, more critical focus on Belgium’s colonial past; an approach that has not only divided the museum staff who curate the exhibits but one that has also drawn criticism from the ‘Old Colonials’ who feel it lacks balance in its account of Belgian colonialism and disproportionately focuses on violence and death.

Yet these efforts to redress the balance mark a new chapter in Belgium’s understanding of its colonial history.

However, there has been some pushback on this revisionism. Key government figures declared Leopold a hero and visionary for his Congo Free State project, whilst other supporters have perpetuated Leopold’s ‘civilising myth’ by claiming that when Leopold arrived the region ‘wasn’t even in the Middle Ages’.

In 2012, a Belgian court ruled against a campaign to ban Herge’s Tintin in the Congo, stating that the book displayed a ‘kind paternalism’ and was not racist.

The conflict in opinion and tension that exists within Belgian society regarding its imperial past is a result of the success of Leopold’s propaganda campaign.

One significant consequence of this campaign was that it created a tradition of pro-empire propaganda. Leopold’s propaganda campaign played a significant role in maintaining the myth that his reign benefitted the Congolese people.

It was also crucial in the forging of an imperial mindset post-annexation and had dominated the narrative of Belgium’s colonial past since.

As the petition gains more signatures and the defacing of statues continues, the protesters and their supporters will face opposition from those whose understanding of Leopold’s role in the Congo and place in Belgium’s colonial history greatly differs from their own, and will ensure that the contest for shaping the narrative on Belgium’s colonial history will be as fierce as the Congo Free State propaganda war, and continue on well into the twenty-first century.

Dr Dean Clay

L’etat C’est Moi: Leopold II and Belgium’s imperial memorials

Lire aussi:

Coronavirus: ces assouplissements annoncés lors du Codeco inquiètent les experts, «c’est trop danger...
Max Verstappen très optimiste après sa 2e place à Bahreïn: «Si c’est un mauvais résultat, alors j’ai...
Annelies Verlinden appelle les communes à respecter les règles: «C’est seulement de cette façon que ...
Demeyer: «Le judiciaire, c’est le parquet, mais l’ordre public, c’est le bourgmestre»
Tags: BelgiumsCestimperialLeopoldLetatmemorialsMoiOpinion
Bnews

Bnews

Related Posts

Coronavirus: ces assouplissements annoncés lors du Codeco inquiètent les experts, «c’est trop dangereux pour le moment»

by Bruxelles News
avril 15, 2021
0
522.3k

Publié le jeudi 15 Avril 2021 à 20h41 Plusieurs experts du nord du pays ont manifesté leur inquiétude quant à...

Max Verstappen très optimiste après sa 2e place à Bahreïn: «Si c’est un mauvais résultat, alors j’ai hâte de vivre les 22 prochains grands prix»

by Sport News
avril 15, 2021
0
522.3k

Publié le jeudi 15 Avril 2021 à 18h32 Battu sur le fil par Lewis Hamilton lors du Grand Prix...

Annelies Verlinden appelle les communes à respecter les règles: «C’est seulement de cette façon que nous limiterons la propagation du virus»

by Bruxelles News
avril 15, 2021
0
522.3k

Publié le jeudi 15 Avril 2021 à 16h10 Par Sudinfo avec Belga La ministre de l’Intérieur, Annelies Verlinden, a...

Demeyer: «Le judiciaire, c’est le parquet, mais l’ordre public, c’est le bourgmestre»

by Bruxelles News
avril 15, 2021
0
522.3k

Le Procureur du Roi de Liège, Philippe Dulieu, veut « remettre l’église au milieu du village ». L’intéressé n’a que très peu...

Next Post

Defaced Churchill statue removed from box for Macron's visit

Recommended

Les effets colatéraux du coronavirus: l’anxiété et la dépression atteignent des niveaux préoccupants chez les jeunes adultes

2 mois ago
522.3k

Coronavirus: le site de Seneffe «réalise toutes ses obligations contractuelles», affirme Thermo Fisher

2 mois ago
522.3k

Popular News

    • EU AFFAIRES
    • MONDE
    • BRUXELLES
    • BELGIQUE
    • SPORT
    • POLITIQUE
    • MAGAZINE
    • DES AVIS

    © 2020 Journal-Belge.Com - Bruxelles.News Journal Belge. LEGAL ISSUES Denial of responsibility! Bruxelles News is an automatic aggregator of the media. In each material the author and a hyperlink to the primary source are specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email [email protected] The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • MONDE
    • EU AFFAIRES
    • BRUXELLES
    • BELGIQUE
    • POLITIQUE
    • MAGAZINE
    • SPORT

    © 2020 Journal-Belge.Com - Bruxelles.News Journal Belge. LEGAL ISSUES Denial of responsibility! Bruxelles News is an automatic aggregator of the media. In each material the author and a hyperlink to the primary source are specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email [email protected] The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Create New Account!

    Fill the forms bellow to register

    All fields are required. Log In

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    Ce site web utilise des cookies. En continuant à utiliser ce site Web, vous consentez à l'utilisation de cookies. Visitez notrePolitique de confidentialité et de cookies.